The last session with Elvira Kalmar was quite interesting - thanks her for that. But my question to my group work was - if final destination is not standing but moving all the time? Then there is a need to shift after each stage and there are no quarantees that you will achieve what you wanted.
The other thought is that targeting at the future solutions is good, but also current problem must be solved - because you cannot go further with heavy burden on your shoulder. So where is the balance between solution oriented approach and problem oriented approach?
The other thought is that targeting at the future solutions is good, but also current problem must be solved - because you cannot go further with heavy burden on your shoulder. So where is the balance between solution oriented approach and problem oriented approach?
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteI largely agree, Nurbek. To me, the angle seemed to be more suited for project-based work than for business "in motion" where many factors have to be balanced continuously and goals are constantly changing.
ReplyDelete